Skip to content
WORLD MODELS · TIMELINE

World Models: 36 Years from Internal Models to WAMs

1990–2026 · Five lineages · 33 milestones

Early explorationLatent-space eraVideo generation · Physical AI · VLAWAM unification1990200020102018202020222023202420252026Model-based RL · Latent DynamicsVideo-generation World ModelsJEPA Predictive EmbeddingsVLA · World Action ModelsEmbodied / Physical World ModelsWorld Models1990 · SchmidhuberPILCO2011 · Deisenroth & RasmussenWorld Models2018 · Ha & SchmidhuberPlaNet2018 · DeepMindMuZero2019 · DeepMindDreamer2019 · Hafner et al.DreamerV22020 · Hafner et al.TD-MPC2022 · Hansen et al.DreamerV32023 · Hafner et al.I-JEPA2023 · Meta AIGAIA-12023 · WayveUniSim2023 · GoogleSora2024 · OpenAIGenie2024 · DeepMindV-JEPA2024 · Meta AI1X World Model2024 · 1X TechnologiesGenie 22024 · DeepMindCosmos2025 · NVIDIAV-JEPA 22025 · Meta AIGenie 32025 · DeepMindRT-22023 · Google DeepMindOpenVLA2024 · Stanford et al.π02024 · Physical IntelligenceGR00T N12025 · NVIDIAHelix2025 · Figure AIWAMs Survey2026 · Fudan University · Shanghai Innovation Institute · NUSACT2023 · StanfordRDT / H-RDT2024 · Tsinghuaπ0.52025 · Physical IntelligenceOpenVLA-OFT2025 · Stanford · BerkeleyGR00T N1.72026 · NVIDIAXiaomi-Robotics-02026 · XiaomiGigaWorld-Policy-02026 · GigaWorld Team
The x-axis is non-linear (1990–2017 compressed). Hover a node for details.← swipe to explore the full timeline →
WAM PHYLOGENY · 2023–2026

Branching Evolution: From VLA to World Action Models

61 site-collected papers · four lineages · taxonomy per arXiv:2605.12090

Vertical axis is paper date (non-linear; the dense 2026 band is expanded). WAM unifies VLA's p(a|o,l) and world models' p(o′|o,a) into the joint distribution p(o′,a|o,l), splitting into cascaded (imagine, then act) and joint (one model generates both) families; the bottom band is the RoboDojo arena snapshot (Aug 2026, 34 models). Hover for details; click a node to open the paper.
PAPERNov 2, 2026

RoboColosseum: Evaluating Physical Intelligence at Scale In-The-Wild

General-purpose robot policies must work across robots, tasks, and environments, yet the variation that makes physical trials informative also makes them difficult to reproduce. We introduce RoboColosseum, a distributed evaluation framework that combines unified policy serving and standardized protocols across a network of locally operated robots in diverse environments. Our initial study evaluates five vision-language-action (VLA) policies and three frontier AI agents across four embodiments (SO-101, Franka, Bimanual-YAM, and G1 Humanoid). The Open Track compares models without task-specific adaptation in blinded, pairwise trials under matched local conditions. The Fine-tune Track measures how well VLA policies adapt to 20 tasks across all four embodiments when each policy receives the same 100 demonstrations per task. Across 5,699 pairwise Open Track comparisons at 124 sites, frontier agents rival specialized VLA policies, while all systems struggle to complete open-world tasks reliably. After fine-tuning, GR00T N1.7 leads on SO-101 and pi0.5 leads on Franka and Bimanual-YAM. Policy rankings show weak agreement across embodiment-specific task suites (Kendall W = 0.24). Open Track rankings poorly predict relative performance after fine-tuning, with substantial rank reversals on all three embodiments shared between tracks. Measuring partial progress reveals differences that task success alone misses. On the G1 Humanoid, no policy completes any of the five tasks, yet average progress ranges from 13.3% to 23.2% across policies. Open Track rankings stabilize as trials accumulate, and active matchmaking achieves comparable ranking agreement with substantially fewer physical trials than uniform sampling. These results show how distributed physical evaluation can reveal where robot policies generalize, how well they adapt to new tasks, and how far they progress on tasks they fail to complete.

Tan Sang Nguyen, Yi Ru Wang, Shailesh Shailesh

Physical AIVLA

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.