Skip to content

MODEL LEADERBOARDS

Leaderboard

Ranks come verbatim from each evaluator's own official board, synced on a schedule. The rulers differ (Arena is human-preference Elo, Terminal-Bench a task success rate, SWE-bench an issue resolve rate), so a score is only comparable within its own board — a cross-board composite would look comparable without being so. This page gives three things: who is on top, by how much, and when the score was measured.

Boards
12
Ranked entries
481
Evaluators
6
Last sync Nov 6, 2026Top 25 per board; the footnote links to the full official board.

Large Language Models

2 boards · 100 entries

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index

artificialanalysis.airanked by: Official intelligence index (higher is better)

Artificial Analysis' own composite intelligence index: knowledge, reasoning and agentic evaluations folded into a single scale — the most widely cited cross-vendor measure of absolute capability. Different reasoning efforts of the same model are listed separately, as the source does.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index — artificialanalysis.ai
#ModelIntelligence IndexPrice in $/MPrice out $/MNotes
1Gemini 4 Carbon (high)Google60.03$4$201M · 2026-10-28
2Claude Opus 5.5 (max)Anthropic59.11$4$201M · 2026-09-22
3Gemini 4 Carbon (medium)Google58.26$4$201M · 2026-10-28
4Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic57.44$4$201M · 2026-09-22
5GPT-6 Astra (max)OpenAI56.85$10$501M · 2026-09-03
6GPT-6 Astra (xhigh)OpenAI55.31$10$501M · 2026-09-03
7GPT-6 Astra (high)OpenAI54.85$10$501M · 2026-09-03
8GPT-6.1 Sol (max)OpenAI54.61$2$101M · 2026-09-29
9Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)Anthropic54.54$2$101M · 2026-09-28
10Gemini 4 Carbon (low)Google54.22$4$201M · 2026-10-28
11GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh)OpenAI52.46$2$101M · 2026-09-29
12Claude Opus 5.5 (high)Anthropic51.84$4$201M · 2026-09-22
13GPT-6 Astra (medium)OpenAI51.55$10$501M · 2026-09-03
14GPT-6.1 Terra (max)OpenAI51.33$1$51M · 2026-10-26
15Gemini 4 Argon (high)Google50.41$4$201M · 2026-09-30
16GPT-6.1 Sol (high)OpenAI50.33$2$101M · 2026-09-29
17Muse Wonder Full (max)Meta50.08——1M · 2026-10-12
18Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh)Anthropic50.02$10$501M · 2026-09-01
19Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh)Anthropic49.92$2$101M · 2026-09-28
20Claude Fable 5.1 (max)Anthropic49.16$10$501M · 2026-09-01
21Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)Anthropic48.21$4$201M · 2026-09-22
22Claude Fable 5.1 (high)Anthropic47.17$10$501M · 2026-09-01
23Kimi K3.1 ProKimi46.45$2$101M · Open · 2026-10-23
24GPT-6.1 Sol (medium)OpenAI46.35$2$101M · 2026-09-29
25GPT-6.1 Terra (xhigh)OpenAI45.25$1$51M · 2026-10-26

Arena Text Chatbot Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: Arena preference score (higher is better)

The largest ongoing human-preference blind eval: Arena (formerly LMArena) ranks models by anonymous real-user battle votes.

Arena Text Chatbot Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelArena scoreVotes
1Gemini 4 Carbon (High)google1540±9.44,403
2Gemini 4 Argon (High)google1529±6.211,889
3Claude Opus 5.5 (High)anthropic1516±6.611,415
4Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)anthropic1514±5.817,178
5Claude Opus 5 (Max)anthropic1508±4.735,531
6Claude Opus 5 (High)anthropic1504±3.673,167
7Claude Opus 4.6 (High)anthropic1502±3.284,512
8Muse Wonder (Max)meta1499±7.37,749
9Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)google1498±4.447,803
10Claude Opus 4.6anthropic1496±3.289,324
11Claude Fable 5 (High)anthropic1492±4.245,341
12MiMo-V2.6-Proxiaomi1491±9.44,037
13Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)meta1491±5.222,134
14Claude Opus 4.7 (High)anthropic1490±3.765,110
15Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)google1489±4.732,289
16Qwen3.8-Maxalibaba1483±4.831,915
17Claude Opus 4.7anthropic1483±3.766,140
18Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh)meta1483±6.311,724
19Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)google1482±3.948,376
20Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgoogle1480±2.9132,547
21Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)google1480±4.436,028
22Gemini 3 Progoogle1479±3.842,057
23Muse Spark 1.1meta1478±4.146,354
24Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)google1478±4.147,196
25Kimi K3 (Max)moonshot1476±4.436,780

Agents

2 boards · 85 entries

Arena Agent Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: IPS score in percentage points (higher is better)

Arena's aggregate Agent eval: an IPS score measures net improvement on real tool-use tasks, with official task cost.

Arena Agent Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelIPS score (%)Cost/task P50 ($)
1Claude Opus 5.5 (Max)anthropic20.04%±2.1$6.82
2Gemini 4 Carbon (High)google16.56%±0.8$1.73
3Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max)anthropic14.62%±2.8$3.94
4GPT-6 Astra (Max)openai13.68%±2.0$6.09
5Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)anthropic13.15%±1.9$6.95
6GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)openai12.24%±1.1$0.96
7Gemini 4 Argon (High)google10.61%±0.8$1
8GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)openai10.19%±1.2$0.79
9Muse Wonder Full (Max)meta9.63%±1.0—
10Claude Fable 5 (High)anthropic7.78%±1.1$3.92
11Claude Opus 5 (Max)anthropic7.6%±1.2$5.62
12GPT-6 Sol (Max)openai6.95%±1.6$1.74
13Kimi K3.1 Pro (Max)moonshot4.7%±1.3$1.47
14GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)openai4.56%±1.0$1.73
15Claude Sonnet 5 (High)anthropic2.84%±1.2$1.11
16Grok 4.7 (xHigh)xai2.64%±1.5$2.61
17Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)google2.56%±0.8$0.76
18Muse Wonder (Max)meta2.51%±1.4$1.43
19Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)meta2.44%±0.8$0.45
20MiMo-V2.6-Proxiaomi2.44%±0.9$0.16
21DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20261017 (Max)deepseek2.13%±0.6$0.18
22GPT-6 Luna (Max)openai1.92%±0.4$0.09
23GLM-5.3 (Max)zai1.17%±0.8$1.14
24Hy4 previewtencent0.94%±0.7$0.44
25Kimi K3 (Max)moonshot0.86%±0.6$1.12

Terminal-Bench 4.0

tbench.airanked by: Task success rate %

Hard terminal-agent benchmark: success rate, cost and tokens on real shell/engineering tasks, maintained by the Laude Institute.

Terminal-Bench 4.0 — tbench.ai
#ModelAccuracy %pass@5TrialsNotes
1Opus 5.5Anthropic · Claude Code64.9%78.8%330Claude Code · $4.7k · 2026-09-22
2Sonnet 5.5Anthropic · Claude Code61.8%77.3%330Claude Code · $7.3k · 2026-09-28
3GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Codex58.2%71.2%330Codex · $3.3k · 2026-09-03
3GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI · Codex58.2%74.2%330Codex · $634.24 · 2026-09-29
5GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Codex57.9%71.2%330Codex · $2.3k · 2026-09-03
5Fable 5.1Anthropic · Claude Code57.9%78.8%330Claude Code · $6.2k · 2026-09-01
5GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Codex57.9%69.7%330Codex · $2.4k · 2026-09-03
5Fable 5.1Anthropic · Claude Code57.9%75.8%330Claude Code · $4.9k · 2026-09-01
9Fable 5.1Anthropic · Claude Code54.6%75.8%330Claude Code · $4.0k · 2026-09-01
10GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Codex54.2%66.7%330Codex · $1.9k · 2026-09-03
11Fable 5.1Anthropic · Claude Code53.9%71.2%330Claude Code · $2.8k · 2026-09-01
11Opus 5Anthropic · Claude Code53.9%69.7%330Claude Code · $6.1k · 2026-07-24
13Opus 5Anthropic · Claude Code51.8%69.7%330Claude Code · $6.0k · 2026-07-24
14GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · Codex50.6%63.6%330Codex · $1.6k · 2026-09-03
15Opus 5Anthropic · Claude Code50.3%74.2%330Claude Code · $4.7k · 2026-07-24
16GPT-6 SolOpenAI · Codex49.4%66.7%330Codex · $1.5k · 2026-09-22
17Opus 5Anthropic · Claude Code44.9%69.7%330Claude Code · $3.2k · 2026-07-24
18Fable 5Anthropic · Claude Code44.6%68.2%330Claude Code · $7.3k · 2026-06-09
19Fable 5.1Anthropic · Claude Code43.3%65.1%330Claude Code · $2.4k · 2026-09-01
20GLM-5.3Z.ai · Claude Code41.8%57.6%330Claude Code · $2.7k · 2026-08-14
21Grok 4.7xAI · Grok Build37.6%60.6%330Grok Build · $3.68k (partial: 324/330) · 2026-09-21
22GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI · Codex37.3%60.6%330Codex · $2.5k · 2026-06-26
23GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai · Claude Code35.8%56.1%330Claude Code · $118.74 · 2026-08-26
24Opus 5Anthropic · Claude Code34.9%62.1%330Claude Code · $2.4k · 2026-07-24
25Qwen3.8-Max-0902Alibaba · Claude Code27%53%330Claude Code · $4.6k · 2026-09-02

Code

1 boards · 49 entries

SWE-bench Verified

swe-bench.comranked by: Issue resolve rate %

Real GitHub-issue repair benchmark (OpenAI-verified subset): end-to-end agent resolve rate, the hardest public signal for coding models.

SWE-bench Verified — swe-bench.com
#ModelResolved %Cost $Notes
1Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 OpusAnthropic79.2%—2025-12-05
2live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 OpusAnthropic79.2%—2025-12-15
3TRAE + Doubao-Seed-CodeByteDance78.8%—2025-09-28
4live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle DeepMind77.4%—2025-11-20
5EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent + Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic76.8%—2025-08-04
6Atlassian Rovo Dev + MultipleAnthropic76.8%—2025-09-02
7mini-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 OpusAnthropic76.8%$376.952026-02-17
8ACoder + MultipleAnthropic76.4%—2025-08-19
9mini-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind75.8%$177.982026-02-17
10mini-SWE-agent + MiniMax M2.5Minimax75.8%$36.642026-02-17
11Warp + MultipleOpenAI75.6%—2025-09-01
12mini-SWE-agent + Claude 4.6 OpusAnthropic75.6%$275.762026-02-17
13TRAE + MultipleAnthropic75.2%—2025-06-12
14Harness AI + Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic74.8%—2025-07-31
15Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 SonnetAnthropic74.8%—2025-11-03
16Lingxi-v1.5 + Claude 4 SonnetAnthropic74.6%—2025-07-20
17JoyCode + MultipleAnthropic74.6%—2025-09-15
18Refact.ai Agent + MultipleAnthropic74.4%—2025-06-03
19Prometheus-v1.2.1 + GPT-5OpenAI74.4%—2025-10-15
20mini-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 OpusAnthropic74.4%$360.622025-11-24
21mini-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro PreviewGoogle DeepMind74.2%$229.982025-11-18
22Salesforce AI Research SAGE + MultipleAnthropic73.8%—2025-11-03
23Tools + Claude 4 OpusAnthropic73.2%—2025-05-22
24Salesforce AI Research SAGE + MultipleAnthropic73%—2025-10-21
25mini-SWE-agent + GLM 5Z-AI72.8%$267.192026-02-17

Image Generation

2 boards · 100 entries

Arena Text-to-Image Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: Arena preference score (higher is better)

Arena text-to-image preference board: blind pairwise votes on identical prompts; Elo-style score and vote count.

Arena Text-to-Image Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelArena scoreVotes
1GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburstopenai1427±5.340,323
2GPT-Image-2.5 Flareopenai1401±5.339,218
3GPT-Image-2 (Medium)openai1381±3.9103,385
4MAI-Image-2.6microsoft-ai1329±5.434,596
5Gemini Nano Banana 2.1google1325±8.85,290
6Grok Imagine Image 2.0xai1317±7.210,902
7Reve 2.1reve1300±7.58,243
8Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (20260801)xai1288±5.526,191
9Muse Imagemeta1269±4.653,444
10Reve 2.0reve1268±6.215,768
11Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (nano-banana-2, Web Search)google1257±3.973,278
12Qwen-Image-3.0-Proalibaba1254±6.511,444
13MAI-Image-2.5microsoft-ai1253±4.261,286
14Seedream 5.0 Probytedance1250±3.9105,824
15Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Image (nano-banana-2-lite)google1249±6.017,813
16Gemini 3 Pro Image (nano-banana-pro, 2K)google1246±3.0188,288
17GPT-Image-1.5 (High Fidelity)openai1236±3.0174,012
18Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview (nano-banana-pro)google1232±4.986,470
19Qwen-Image-2.1alibaba1225±6.019,604
20Ideogram 4.0 (Quality)ideogram1200±3.872,865
21Qwen-Image-2.0-Pro (2026-06-22)alibaba1191±5.813,092
22UNI-1.1 Maxluma-ai1189±6.214,076
23MAI-Image-2microsoft-ai1183±4.551,442
24UNI-1.1luma-ai1183±4.255,179
25Grok Imagine Imagexai1169±2.6286,515

Arena Image Edit Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: Arena preference score (higher is better)

Arena image-edit preference board: blind rankings for instruction fidelity and edit quality.

Arena Image Edit Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelArena scoreVotes
1GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburstopenai1517±4.990,545
2GPT-Image-2.5 Flareopenai1482±4.787,941
3MAI-Image-2.7-Previewmicrosoft-ai1471±10.23,402
4GPT-Image-2 (Medium)openai1460±3.1336,785
5Grok Imagine Image 2.0xai1439±5.632,951
6MAI-Image-2.6microsoft-ai1427±4.776,933
7Gemini Nano Banana 2.1google1427±5.812,956
8Grok Imagine Image 2.0 (20260801)xai1418±4.586,928
9Krea 3 Ultrakrea1411±11.02,799
10MAI-Image-2.5microsoft-ai1400±3.7190,127
11Muse Imagemeta1400±3.9173,384
12Grok Imagine Image (Quality, 20260519)xai1391±5.638,207
13Seedream 5.0 Probytedance1390±3.3317,111
14Gemini 3 Pro Image (nano-banana-pro, 2K)google1390±2.5685,788
15Gemini 3.1 Flash Image (nano-banana-2, Web Search)google1387±3.1262,911
16ChatGPT Image Latest (High Fidelity, 20251216)openai1386±2.6659,303
17Gemini 3 Pro Image Preview (nano-banana-pro)google1385±2.8540,717
18Reve 2.1reve1373±6.020,815
19GPT-Image-1.5 (High Fidelity)openai1368±2.6684,650
20Qwen-Image-2.1alibaba1362±5.939,412
21Reve 2.0reve1358±6.519,281
22Ideogram 4.5ideogram1347±4.757,711
23UNI-1.1 Maxluma-ai1334±4.943,462
24Grok Imagine Imagexai1329±2.4805,966
25UNI-1.1luma-ai1316±3.3218,673

Video Generation

2 boards · 96 entries

Arena Text-to-Video Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: Arena preference score (higher is better)

Arena text-to-video preference board: double-blind votes on motion quality, prompt adherence and aesthetics.

Arena Text-to-Video Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelArena scoreVotes
1gemini-omni-1.1-flashgoogle1516±15.41,784
2gemini-omni-flashgoogle1513±9.026,576
3flux-3-videobfl1493±17.21,302
4grok-imagine-video-1.5-agentxai1492±18.31,218
5dreamina-seedance-2.0-720pbytedance1479±8.056,318
6wan3.0alibaba1476±12.72,598
7dreamina-seedance-2.5-720pbytedance1474±8.58,001
8minimax-h3minimax1460±8.611,417
9muse-videometa1456±14.72,188
10happyhorse-1.0aorizon1427±12.522,264
11sora-2-proopenai1368±6.754,167
12veo-3.1-audiogoogle1364±14.413,741
13veo-3.1-audio-1080pgoogle1362±10.325,076
14veo-3.1-fast-audiogoogle1362±10.439,484
15veo-3.1-fast-audio-1080pgoogle1358±10.025,870
16veo-3-fast-audiogoogle1348±11.325,258
17sora-2openai1343±6.171,947
18grok-imagine-video-720pxai1342±6.4165,462
19veo-3-audiogoogle1340±12.619,002
20wan2.7-t2vwan1337±7.327,626
21wan2.6-t2valibaba1327±7.454,050
22seedance-v1.5-probytedance1256±6.776,171
23veo-3google1254±11.315,005
24veo-3-fastgoogle1248±11.915,283
25wan2.5-t2v-previewalibaba1245±8.736,378

Arena Image-to-Video Leaderboard

arena.airanked by: Arena preference score (higher is better)

Arena image-to-video preference board: double-blind votes on first-frame fidelity and motion plausibility.

Arena Image-to-Video Leaderboard — arena.ai
#ModelArena scoreVotes
1minimax-h3minimax1495±5.257,112
2gemini-omni-1.1-flashgoogle1488±10.93,734
3wan3.0alibaba1480±10.83,442
4dreamina-seedance-2.5-720pbytedance1477±7.215,729
5dreamina-seedance-2.0-720pbytedance1475±7.0121,427
6gemini-omni-flashgoogle1465±5.587,155
7hidream-o1-video-1.0hidream1456±7.96,488
8grok-imagine-video-1.5-720pxai1456±4.2137,459
9flux-3-video-20260811bfl1449±4.937,042
10happyhorse-1.0aorizon1442±9.870,640
11wan2.7-i2vwan1428±4.885,521
12grok-imagine-video-720pxai1415±4.1554,050
13veo-3.1-audiogoogle1398±10.525,116
14veo-3.1-audio-1080pgoogle1390±8.653,089
15veo-3.1-fast-audiogoogle1385±8.899,804
16grok-imagine-video-480pxai1385±8.419,429
17veo-3.1-fast-audio-1080pgoogle1372±9.554,380
18vidu-q3-proshengshu1363±8.736,679
19kling-v3-prokling1354±5.5206,221
20veo-3-audiogoogle1331±11.632,367
21veo-3-fast-audiogoogle1326±9.541,194
22wan2.5-i2v-previewalibaba1321±10.316,907
23wan2.6-i2valibaba1310±6.8121,082
24seedance-v1.5-probytedance1307±7.1245,206
25pixverse-v5.61299±7.3126,710

3D Generation

1 boards · 6 entries

T3 Bench 3D Generation Leaderboard

t3bench.comranked by: GPT-4V judged average

Official text-to-3D benchmark: GPT-4V-judged averages on single-object, single-with-surroundings and multi-object sets.

T3 Bench 3D Generation Leaderboard — t3bench.com
#ModelAverageSingle Obj.Single w/ Surr.Multi Obj.
1ProlificDreamer43.349.444.835.8
2Magic3D32.73735.425.7
3LatentNeRF28.133.130.620.6
4Fantasia3D2426.42718.5
5DreamFusion21.724.424.616.1
6SJC18.724.719.811.7

Embodied AI

2 boards · 45 entries

RoboDojo Simulation Leaderboard

robodojo-benchmark.comranked by: Official composite score

Unified embodied-policy eval: 42 sim tasks across generalization, precision, long-horizon, memory and open-ended dims.

RoboDojo Simulation Leaderboard — robodojo-benchmark.com
#ModelGen-StdGen-RandPrecisionLong-HorizonMemoryOpen-EndedAverage
1DM0.5Dexmal23.58.124.833.747.72.424.9
2GalaxeaVLA (G0.5)Galaxea AI26.711.228.344.18.61.720.2
3Xiaomi-Robotics-1Xiaomi Robotics35.711.426.738.47.83.920.1
4Hy-Embodied-0.5-VLATencent Robotics X221.613.825.713.40.713.1
5Spatial ForcingOpenHelix Robotics21.3717.323.35.41.812.4
6Pi-05RoboDojo Team20.95.812.423.55.8211.4
7InternVLA-A1.5InternVLA Team16.83.915.223.84.91.411.2
8VLActStarVLA Team16.32.720.620.10.72.410.7
9X-VLARoboDojo Team17.9318.316.54.80.610.1
10X-WAMX-WAM Team11.23.56.717.56.30.67.7
11Xiaomi-Robotics-0RoboDojo Team13.81.18.413.55.10.26.9
12StarVLARoboDojo Team7.50.39.914.23.30.76.4
13GigaWorld-Policy-0RoboDojo Team10.30.46.215.53.50.56.2
14GalaxeaVLA (G0)RoboDojo Team8.70.48.112.63.20.75.8
15LingBot-VLARoboDojo Team10.92.65.310.93.80.75.5
16EventVLASJTU ScaleLab6.71.210.15.14.90.85
17AHA-WAMSJTU ScaleLab10.31.35.98.630.94.8
18ABot-M0RoboDojo Team9.22.35.542.40.73.7
19Fast-WAMRoboDojo Team4.30.329.13.60.43.5
20Pi-0RoboDojo Team7.20.73.66.23.50.33.5
21GROOT-N1.7RoboDojo Team40.42.58.31.10.22.9
22InternVLA-A1RoboDojo Team5.20.534.81.60.22.5
23SmolVLA (Single Task)RoboDojo Team3.30.12.91.23.401.8
24LDA-1BRoboDojo Team1.40.23.21.92.101.6
25MolmoAct2RoboDojo Team0.700.52.310.91

RoboDojo Real-World Leaderboard

robodojo-benchmark.comranked by: Official composite score

Real-robot embodied eval: 18 tasks on ARX X5, Piper and Piper X.

RoboDojo Real-World Leaderboard — robodojo-benchmark.com
#ModelARX X5PiperPiper XAverage
1Pi-05RoboDojo Team27.7329.122.9
2InternVLA-A1RoboDojo Team1023.22.712
3GalaxeaVLA (G0)RoboDojo Team3.4221.79
4Xiaomi-Robotics-0RoboDojo Team157.61.27.9
5X-VLARoboDojo Team6.815.90.17.6
6GROOT-N1.7RoboDojo Team9.36.81.45.9
7Pi-0RoboDojo Team8.190.35.8
8StarVLARoboDojo Team0120.54.1
9Spirit v1.5RoboDojo Team040.71.6
10DM0RoboDojo Team0000

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.