Skip to content
WORLD MODELS · TIMELINE

World Models: 36 Years from Internal Models to WAMs

1990–2026 · Five lineages · 33 milestones

Early explorationLatent-space eraVideo generation · Physical AI · VLAWAM unification1990200020102018202020222023202420252026Model-based RL · Latent DynamicsVideo-generation World ModelsJEPA Predictive EmbeddingsVLA · World Action ModelsEmbodied / Physical World ModelsWorld Models1990 · SchmidhuberPILCO2011 · Deisenroth & RasmussenWorld Models2018 · Ha & SchmidhuberPlaNet2018 · DeepMindMuZero2019 · DeepMindDreamer2019 · Hafner et al.DreamerV22020 · Hafner et al.TD-MPC2022 · Hansen et al.DreamerV32023 · Hafner et al.I-JEPA2023 · Meta AIGAIA-12023 · WayveUniSim2023 · GoogleSora2024 · OpenAIGenie2024 · DeepMindV-JEPA2024 · Meta AI1X World Model2024 · 1X TechnologiesGenie 22024 · DeepMindCosmos2025 · NVIDIAV-JEPA 22025 · Meta AIGenie 32025 · DeepMindRT-22023 · Google DeepMindOpenVLA2024 · Stanford et al.π02024 · Physical IntelligenceGR00T N12025 · NVIDIAHelix2025 · Figure AIWAMs Survey2026 · Fudan University · Shanghai Innovation Institute · NUSACT2023 · StanfordRDT / H-RDT2024 · Tsinghuaπ0.52025 · Physical IntelligenceOpenVLA-OFT2025 · Stanford · BerkeleyGR00T N1.72026 · NVIDIAXiaomi-Robotics-02026 · XiaomiGigaWorld-Policy-02026 · GigaWorld Team
The x-axis is non-linear (1990–2017 compressed). Hover a node for details.← swipe to explore the full timeline →
WAM PHYLOGENY · 2023–2026

Branching Evolution: From VLA to World Action Models

61 site-collected papers · four lineages · taxonomy per arXiv:2605.12090

Vertical axis is paper date (non-linear; the dense 2026 band is expanded). WAM unifies VLA's p(a|o,l) and world models' p(o′|o,a) into the joint distribution p(o′,a|o,l), splitting into cascaded (imagine, then act) and joint (one model generates both) families; the bottom band is the RoboDojo arena snapshot (Aug 2026, 34 models). Hover for details; click a node to open the paper.
PAPERAug 4, 2026

PhyAI: Real-Time Physical AI at the Edge, Scalable Rollouts in the Cloud

Physical AI policies require inference throughout their lifecycle, including model evaluation, cloud reinforcement learning rollout, edge GPU serving, and onboard deployment. Although these settings share the same checkpoint and action semantics, they often rely on separate inference programs. To unify them, we build PhyAI, a Physical AI inference engine with a single runtime that keeps architecture-specific conditioning, solver, cache, and output logic in model adapters while sharing graph execution, kernels, memory management, and parallel services. The same codebase runs vision-language-action (VLA) models and world-action models (WAMs) on single or multiple GPUs across onboard, edge, and cloud deployments. We used the adapter interface to add MiniCPM-Robot on the day of its release. PhyAI achieves 1.40x-4.65x speedups over the official implementations of pi0, pi0.5, GR00T N1.7, and MiniCPM-Robot. On Cosmos3-Nano-Policy-DROID it reduces latency from 2.46 to 1.18 s on eight H20 GPUs (CFG=2, TP=4), a 2.08x speedup. Specialized runtimes remain faster in several configurations, so our goal is one runtime with competitive latency rather than the fastest result in every case. Detailed profiles reveal why different models need different execution policies: on a Hopper-series GPU at batch size one, the pi0.5 action expert accounts for 8.8% of FLOPs but 57.2% of latency; at batch size 32 its share drops to 13.5% and throughput reaches about 100 samples/s. Cosmos3 remains generation-dominated and gains only 14.3% throughput as batch size increases from 1 to 16. We further introduce the control-time Roofline, which distinguishes inference-bound from environment-bound control; the measured pi0.5 points on four LIBERO suites are environment-bound while Cosmos3 stays inference-bound. Code and benchmarks: https://github.com/mingti-org/phyai.

Chenghua Wang, Daliang Xu, Dongqi Cai

Physical AIVLA
PAPERJul 30, 2026

FA-RDP: A Frequency-Adaptive Reactive Diffusion Policy for Contact-Rich Manipulation

In contact-rich manipulation, action multimodality and reactivity dominate different stages of a single episode. Before contact, multiple trajectories might be equally valid, making it important to preserve diverse action modes. After contact, geometric constraints and force limits narrow the solution space, while successful execution demands rapid responses to force feedback. However, standard diffusion policies use a fixed inference frequency and sampling steps throughout the episode, forcing a fundamental compromise: low-frequency, multi-step sampling better preserves pre-contact multimodality but responds slowly to force feedback, whereas high-frequency sampling improves reactivity but tends to collapse distinct pre-contact modes. To resolve this tradeoff, we present FA-RDP, a frequency-adaptive reactive diffusion policy. A shared multi-frequency visual-force Transformer predicts action chunks at both low and high frequencies, while a learned multimodality indicator dynamically selects multi-step low-frequency sampling before contact and one-step high-frequency sampling as action ambiguity decreases. We further introduce Manifold Consistency Distillation (MCD), which reparameterizes the diffusion network to predict actions on the robot action manifold while retaining DDPM-based residual supervision. Experiments on three contact-rich manipulation tasks show that FA-RDP achieves the highest success rate while preserving diverse pre-contact trajectory modes. Code and videos are available at https://fa-rdp.github.io.

Lifeng Zhuo, Wendi Chen, Han Xue

VLADiffusion policies

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.